Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 CAL 541 - Rodley v. Curry

Rodley v. Curry’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 1991
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 1991

12 state decisions

4018981900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is so well settled that the amount for which judgment is demanded in the complaint determines the jurisdiction of the court that no authorities need be cited. Any other rule would be fraught with uncertainties'and mischiefs beyond the power of anticipation.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.