Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 CAL 626 - People v. Ebanks

People v. Ebanks’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
June 1971
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on People v. McNulty · People v. Durrant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant contends that the information against him, and upon which he was convicted, was invalid because at the time the information was filed there was a grand jury of the county in session, and that while the grand jury was in session he could not be put upon his trial upon an information. This contention could not be maintained, even if made on an appeal from the final judgment, for the two modes of procedure . (by indictment or information) are concurrent * * *.” 52 P. at 1078 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.