Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 CALAPP2D 303 - People v. Moore

People v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
3
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently June 2005 · most notably Juan v. Allen III (2005), State v. Mathers (1990)

54 state decisions

320195319601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Gutierrez · 20 Ala. App. 236 - Haney v. State · Ex Parte Traylor · People v. Hymer · State v. Bishop

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The presence of one at the commission of a felony by another is evidence to be considered in determining whether or not he was guilty of aiding and abetting; and it has also been held that presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the offense are circumstances from which one’s participation in the criminal intent may be inferred.” 120 Cal.App.2d at p. 306 , 260 P.2d at p. 1013 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “was in the position of a lookout[,] ... was in the company of the other defendants before the crime was committed, remained with them during the robbery, fled with them from the [crime scene], and when arrested in company with the others had the knife and stolen bills in his possession”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`all intendments are in favor of the judgment and a verdict will not be set aside unless the record clearly shows that upon no hypothesis whatsoever is there sufficient substantial evidence to support it.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.