120 Cal. App. 4th 721 - Berg v. Darden’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 32 Cal. 3d 668 - Folsom v. Butte County Assn. of Governments · 36 Cal. 3d 273 - T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior Court · 52 Cal. 3d 266 - Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit District · 3 Cal. 4th 797 - Bank of San Pedro v. Superior Court · 96 Cal. App. 4th 1017 - American Airlines, Inc. v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the offeree is uncertain about some aspect of the offer ... he is free to explore those matters with the offeror, or even to make counter-proposals during the period in which the statutory offer remains outstanding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An otherwise clear section 998 offer is not rendered invalid simply because it does not track precisely the language of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the offeree must be able to clearly evaluate the worth of the extended offer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.