In re Galt’s Empirical Analysis
120 F. 64 · 1903
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 10 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. (1911), John Deere Plow Co. v. McDavid (1905)
14 federal appellate · 10 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sturm v. Boker · Harkness v. Russell · Chickering v. Bastress · Lenz v. Harrison · State v. Leicham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In a bailment the bailor may require the restoration of the thing bailed, and in a sale, whether absolute or conditional, there must be an agreement, express or implied, to pay the purchase price of the thing sold.””
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.