Davis v. City of Hollywood’s Empirical Analysis
120 F.3d 1178 · 1997
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc. (1997), Wayne Block (2001)
14 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Auer v. Robbins · Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority · Oxman v. WLS-TV · Avery v. City of Talladega · Matthews v. Allis-Chalmers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here a deduction not permitted by these interpretations is inadvertent, or is made for reasons other than lack of work, the exemption will not be considered to have been lost if the employer reimburses the employee for such deductions and promises to comply in the future.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.