Beller Keller v. Tyler’s Empirical Analysis
120 F.3d 21 · 1997
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably City of New York v. Mickalis Pawn Shop, LLC (2011), State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Inversiones Errazuriz Limitada (2004)
11 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fustok v. ContiCommodity Services, Inc. · McLearn v. Cowen & Co. · Planet Corp. v. Sullivan · Gold Kist, Inc. v. Laurinburg Oil Co. · S. Stewart Crosby v. The Bradstreet Company, and L. Lloyd Crosby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after entry of the judgment. Courts have been exceedingly lenient in defining the term”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“although most motions to declare a judgment void rest on claims that the court lacked jurisdiction over the parties, the subject matter, or both, a judgment is equally void if a court with jurisdiction has acted in a manner inconsistent with due process of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The first step is to obtain an entry of default. When a party against whom affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, a plaintiff may bring that fact to the court's attention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.