Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 F.3d 293 - In Re Oliver L. North (Dwyer Fee Application)

In Re Oliver L. North (Dwyer Fee Application)’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
February 2004
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Olson v. 86-1 · In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application) · In Re Oliver L. North (Bush Fee Application) · In re Sealed Case · In Re Raymond J Donovan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in the absence of some showing that local counsel could not have rendered the service involved and thereby obviated the necessity of employing an attorney”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the Act. In re Sealed Case, 890 F.2d 451 , 452 (D.C.Cir., Spec. Div.1989) (per curiam). The purpose of awarding only fees that would not have been incurred”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.