Mann v. Dn Haigh’s Empirical Analysis
120 F.3d 34 · 1997
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 6 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Williams v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. (2004), McLean v. United States (2009)
10 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Testan · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · United States v. King · First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“review under the Back Pay Act, Pub.L. No. 89-380, 80 Stat. 94 (1966) (codified as amended at 5 U.S.C.A. § 5596 ), of an adverse personnel action that was not subject to review under the CSRA. 484 U.S. at 455 , 108 S.Ct. at 677-78 . 17 Applying Fausto, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held in an action involving the termination of a NAFI employee that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mann v. Haigh“in view of the comprehensiveness of the CSRA . . . the CSRA prevents [government ] employees from obtaining judicial review of an adverse employment decision under the APA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A person suffering legal wrong because of agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by agency action . . . is entitled to judicial review thereof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.