Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 F.3d 564 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

120 F.3d 564 · 1997

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2015 · most notably United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez (2008), United States v. Posada-Rios (1998)

25 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

390199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Whren v. United States · United States v. Robinson · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · United States v. Dunn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the officers could reasonably believe that the gate provided the principal means of access to the apartment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.