Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

120 F.3d 603

Docket No. 96-3017.

Rubin

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided July 7, 1997.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2024

1 state decisions

Relies on Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. Blatter

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BEFORE: MARTIN, Chief Judge; MERRITT, KENNEDY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE and COLE, Circuit Judges.

¶1

Prior report: 110 F.3d 1247.

¶2

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

¶3

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

¶4

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and the case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

¶5

It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, August 22, 1997, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, September 22, 1997. The Clerk will schedule this case for argument as directed by the court.

/120/f3d/603 · .json · Public domain