Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 F.3d 730 - Maier v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.

Maier v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

120 F.3d 730 · 1997

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2016 · most notably Chiaramonte v. Fashion Bed Group, Inc. (1997), Debs v. Northeastern Illinois University (1998)

30 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

240199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp. · Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. · New Jersey v. New York · Dimick v. Schiedt · 115 Ill. 2d 482 - Duldulao v. Saint Mary of Nazareth Hospital Center

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]uch a theory of liability [disparate impact] is not cognizable under the ADEA.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Smith

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.