Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 Idaho 532 - State v. Dambrell

State v. Dambrell’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
5
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2020

15 state decisions

801991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Duren v. Missouri · State v. Hedger · 36 Cal. 3d 210 - People v. Caldwell · Woolls v. Texas · State v. Lankford

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] defendant in a criminal action is entitled to have [the defendant’s] legal theory of the ease submitted to the jury under proper instructions. However, refusal of defendant’s requested instructions allegedly dealing with [the defendant’s] defense theory is not error where the proposed statement is either erroneous in its statement of the law, is not supported by the evidence or constitutes an impermissible comment on the evidence, or is adequately covered by other instructions given by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) correctly perceived the issue as one involving the exercise of discretion, (2) acted within the outer boundaries of its discretion and consistently with any legal standards applicable to specific choices it had, and (3) reached its decision by an exercise of reason.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “. . . the guarantee of the sixth amendment is not that each racial or ethnic group present in the community be represented on each jury panel, but only that there be a fair cross-section of the community.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.