Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 Idaho 765 - McCoy v. Lyons

McCoy v. Lyons’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
4
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

2 district · 59 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably 35 Cal. App. 4th 733 - Villa v. McFerren (1995), Harris v. State, Dept. of Health (1992)

2 district · 59 state decisions

3601991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co. · Anderson v. Ethington · 75 Wash. 2d 660 - Ruth v. Dight · Doe v. Durtschi · Mantz v. Follingstad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hen professional malpractice involves fraudulent or intentional concealment of the wrongdoing, ... the statute of limitations contained in I.C. § 5-219(4) is tolled until the injured party “knows or in the exercise of reasonable care should have been put on inquiry regarding the ... matter complained of.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Form of Affidavits—Further Testimony—Defense Required. Supporting and opposing affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein. Sworn or certified copies of all papers or parts thereof referred to in an affidavit shall be attached thereto or served therewith. The court may permit affidavits to be supplemented or opposed by depositions, answers to interrogatories, or further affidavits. When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of that party’s pleadings, but the party’s response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If the party does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered against the party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.