Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

120 Ind. 134

Wright v. Ball

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1889

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1889-09-28

<p>Practice. — Pleading.—Exception.—An exception is necessary to present' . any question upon a ruling sustaining a demurrer to a pleading.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1912

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1889-09-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mitchell, J.

¶1Suit by Ball and others against Wright on a note, payable in a .bank in this State, signed by the defendant as maker, and endorsed by the payee to the plaintiffs before maturity. The defendant complains of the ruling of the court in sustaining a demurrer to his cross-complaint, in which he set up facts upon which he asked that the note sued on be cancelled.

¶2There was no exception to the ruling of the court of which complaint is now made. There is, therefore, no question in the record.

¶3The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

/120/ind/134 · .json · Public domain