Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 IND 172 - Fosher v. Guilliams

Fosher v. Guilliams’s Empirical Analysis

1889

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
5
states following
July 1956
most recently cited

1 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 1956

1 district · 16 state decisions

7018891890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bryan v. Uland · Cowdrey v. Hitchcock · Stephens v. Gibbes · Dougherty v. Barnes · Caywood v. Medsker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As was well remarked in Price v. Woodford, 43 Mo. 247 : ‘The right of election is a statutory privilege, conferring new and important benefits, and outside of the statute has no existence. It must therefore be exercised in substantial compliance with it.’ Ewing v. Ewing, 44 Mo. 23 ; Dougherty v. Barnes, 64 Mo. 159 . The right to elect is strictly personal, which can be exercised by the -widow alone,- and although she die before the time for election has expired, in the absence of a statute authorizing it to be made afterwards by her heirs or representatives, the right of election expires with her. 1 Woerner, Adm’r, 270.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ If, through any fraud or contrivance of those interested in the estate, the widow was prevented from making an •election, a court of equity might find means of affording relief against those who perpetrated the fraud.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.