Roseberry v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
1926
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 1971
7 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Malone v. Murphy · Nevins v. Nevins · Stalker v. Drake · Booth v. Scott · Cady v. Case
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The cases of Malone v. Murphy, 2 Kan. 250 ; Wiley v. Keokuk, 6 id. 94, and other similar decisions in this court, holding that, whenever the elements of fraud, malice, gross negligence, or oppression mingle in the controversy, the law allows the jury to give what is called exemplary or vindictive damages, followed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stoner v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.