Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 NC 180 - Russell v. Ayer

Russell v. Ayer’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
4
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 1984

2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

301897190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It must be presumed that they knew what they were doing and that they meant to do what they did.. The act was perfectly regular on its face, had passed its several readings and was duly ratified, and no proof as to mistake or error can now be heard in this Court to contradict its provisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.