Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 N.C. 443 - Heiser v. . Mears

Heiser v. . Mears’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
December 1952
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 1952

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

301897190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a contract for the sale of specific articles, then in existence and ready for delivery, and the purchaser refuses compliance, the seller has three remedies, at his option: (1) To treat the property as his own, and sue for damages; (2) as the property of the buyer, and sue for the price; (3) as the property of the buyer, and to resell it for him, and sue for the difference between the contract price and that obtained on resale.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.