Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 N.C. App. 203 - Beam v. Kerlee

120 N.C. App. 203 - Beam v. Kerlee’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
2
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably 145 N.C. App. 525 - Lake Mary Ltd. Partnership v. Johnston (2001), Beam v. Kerlee (1996)

46 state decisions

340199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dickinson v. Pake · Cutts v. Casey · 116 N.C. App. 663 - Davis v. Town of Southern Pines · McDaris v. Breit Bar" T" Corporation · Enns v. Zayre Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A directed verdict is properly granted where it appears, as a matter of law, that the nonmoving party cannot recover upon any view of the facts which the evidence reasonably tends to establish.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When questioned about other people’s use of the land, defendant testified that he put up no trespassing signs in 1991 and asked hunters he found on the property to leave. Defendant said he had been running people off the land long before he posted the property — “for twenty plus years.” This evidence was sufficient to support defendant’s claim that his possession of the land was exclusive and adverse as to all others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “was an expert in land survey and his testimony may have helped the jury understand conclusions which could be drawn [therefrom]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.