Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 N.C. App. 623 - State v. McBride

120 N.C. App. 623 - State v. McBride’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 153 N.C. App. 69 - State v. Pimental (2002), 142 N.C. App. 491 - State v. Brown (2001)

39 state decisions

200199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Abney v. United States · Lehman Bros. v. Lilly · Lefkowitz v. Newsome · State v. Collins · 70 N.C. App. 627 - Estrada v. Jaques

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] defendant bears the burden of notifying the state and the trial court during plea negotiations of the intention to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress, or the right to do so is waived after a plea of guilty.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]his statutory right to appeal is conditional, not absolute.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Once a defendant strikes the most advantageous bargain possible with the prosecution, that bargain is incontestable by the state once judgment is final. If the defendant may first strike the plea bargain, "lock in" the State upon final judgment, and then appeal a previously denied suppression motion, it gets a second bite at the apple, a bite usually meant to be foreclosed by the plea bargain itself.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.