State v. Havel’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 1951
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Paxton v. State · Central National Bank v. Ericson · Schmelzel v. Leecy · Nothdurft v. City of Lincoln · Kimble v. Roeder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When one induces and arranges with and influences witnesses to testify falsely in an action not then pending, and in accordance with said plans, at the time of the trial, calls the said witnesses to testify in his behalf and they testify falsely, such action constitutes contempt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Osborne v. Purdome
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.