Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

120 Nev. 1043

102 P.3d 606

120 Nev.Adv.Rep. 105

McConnell v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2004

Nevada Supreme Court · decided 2004-12-29

Relies on Ring v. Arizona · Lowenfield v. Phelps · Petrocelli v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-12-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Weber v. State (2005), McConnell v. State (2009)

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 54 state decisions

330200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Becker, J.,

¶1concurring in result only:

¶2I agree with the decision of the court to affirm McConnell’s conviction. I also agree that the court needs to consider the valid*1074ity of Nevada’s death penalty scheme in light of Lowenfield v. Phelps,1 the changes in Nevada’s statutes that have occurred since our decision in Petrocelli v. State,2and recent reconsideration of death penalty case law by the United States Supreme Court.3 However, in light of the sixteen-year period that has passed since Lowenfield, I would still have set this matter for oral argument, despite the State’s failure to address Lowenfield, and I also believe the court should have requested amicus briefing. For these reasons I concur only in the result.

¶3484 U.S. 231 (1988).

¶4101 Nev. 46, 692 P.2d 503 (1985), holding modified on other grounds by Sonner v. State, 114 Nev. 321, 327, 955 P.2d 673 , 677 (1998).

¶5See Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002).

/120/nev/1043 · .json · Public domain