Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 Nev. 559 - Williams v. Williams

Williams v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2025

20 state decisions

80200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sanguinetti v. Sanguinetti · Succession of Chavis · Western States Construction, Inc. v. Michoff · Castle v. Simmons · Sack v. Tomlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Hulings supported by substantial evidence will not be disturbed on appeal”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Substantial evidence is that which a sensible person may accept as adequate to sustain a judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.