State v. Handa’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
70 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Bernal (2006), State v. Nunez (1999)
70 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Broce · Herron v. State · State v. Gonzales · State v. Hodge · Govich v. North American Systems, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We emphasize that the time between each act is not dispositive. For example, if multiple shots are fired all pursuant to a single, continuous intent, they constitute a single offense, irrespective of whether an extensive period of time elapses between each shot. The proximity in time between criminal acts merely indicates that the greater the interval between acts, the greater the likelihood of separate offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Demongey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.