Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 Ohio App. 3d 448 - Badgett v. Badgett

120 Ohio App. 3d 448 - Badgett v. Badgett’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
April 2020
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2020

21 state decisions

1201997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 69 Ohio St. 3d 373 - State ex rel. Papp v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When making the allocation of the parental rights and responsibilities for the care of the children under this section in an original proceeding or in any proceeding for modification of a prior order of the court making the allocation, the court shall take into account that which would be in the best interest of the children. In determining the child's best interest for purposes of making its allocation of the parental rights and responsibilities for the care of the child and for purposes of resolving any issues related to the making of that allocation, the court, in its discretion, may and, upon the request of either party, shall interview in chambers any or all of the involved children regarding their wishes and concerns with respect to the allocation.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(2) If the court interviews any child pursuant to division (B)(1) of this section, all of the following apply: {¶ 29}”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The court shall not modify a prior decree allocating parental rights and responsibilities for the care of children unless it finds, based on facts that have arisen since the prior decree . . . that a change has occurred in the circumstances of the child, [or] his residential parent or either of the parents subject to a shared parenting decree, and that the modification is necessary to serve the best interest of the child. (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.