Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 Ohio App. 3d 59 - Cochran v. Schwartz

120 Ohio App. 3d 59 - Cochran v. Schwartz’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 75 Ill. App. 3d 549 - Curtin v. Ogborn · Higgs v. United States · 317 So. 2d 868 - Bruce Builders, Inc. v. Goodwin · 54 Ohio App. 2d 1 - Ottenstein v. Western Reserve Academy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] provision in a contract for the sale of real estate allowing the vendor to keep the earnest money paid in the event of a default by the vendee is a valid, enforceable provision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the enforceability of a provision in a real estate contract for the retention of earnest money by the vendor in the event of default by the vendee”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “against Schwartz, although we stated that the 7.25 percent ratio between the earnest money deposit and the purchase price”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.