Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 OHIOST3D 176 - State v. Veney

State v. Veney’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

1,232
cited by 1,232 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

1,232 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,232 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion) (2020), State v. Barker (2011)

1,232 state decisions

8220200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · State v. Nero · State v. Ballard · State v. Engle

Cited together with State v. Nero · State v. Clark · State v. Ballard · State v. Engle · Strickland v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,232 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Substantial compliance means that under the totality of the circumstances the defendant subjectively understands the implications of his plea and the rights he is waiving.”
    34 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “record shows that the judge explained these rights in a manner reasonably intelligible to the defendant.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'When a defendant enters a plea in a criminal case, the plea must be made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. Failure on any of those points renders enforcement of the plea unconstitutional under both the United States Constitution and the Ohio Constitution.'”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.