State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably State v. Mason (2007), State v. Kirkpatrick (2007)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · 104 Wash. 2d 412 - State v. Guloy · 117 Wash. 2d 829 - State v. Lord · State v. Roggenkamp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]ue process requires the State to prove every element of the charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Keend · State v. Peterson“[w]hen considering facts in a challenge to sufficiency of the evidence, courts will draw all inferences from the evidence in favor of the State and against the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lakotiy“State v. Salinas, 119 Wash.2d 192, 201 , 829 P.2d 1068 (1992).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lakotiy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.