State v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2022
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 95 Wash. 2d 898 - State v. Seagull · State v. Mendez · 128 Wash. 2d 262 - State v. Cole · 109 Wash. 2d 484 - State v. Pelkey · 137 Wash. 2d 208 - State v. Mendez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When a defendant presents a defense case in chief, he waives his right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss made at the end of the State's case in chief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Frantz“If a minor is unclothed and the picture is' for the sexual stimulation of the viewer, then it meets the definition of sexually explicit conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whipple“for the purpose of sexual stimulation of the viewer,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whipple
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.