Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

120 So. 3d 1280

Sirdevan v. Strand

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 19, 2013

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-09-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 2016

1 state decisions

Relies on 64 So. 3d 128 - Slowinski v. Sweeney

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-09-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1James P. Sirdevan, the legal father of the child at issue in this proceeding, petitions for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the trial court’s non-final order denying his motion for summary judgment wherein he challenged Respondent Jeffrey B. Strand’s standing to file a paternity petition. We GRANT the petition and QUASH the trial court’s order. See Slowinski v. Sweeney, 64 So.3d 128, 128-29 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding that a child born to an intact marriage cannot be the subject of a paternity proceeding brought by a biological father and determining that it was fundamental error for the trial court to grant relief pursuant to a nonexistent cause of action).

LEWIS, C.J., MARSTILLER and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
/120/so3d/1280 · .json · Public domain