120 So. 3d 577 - Powell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The existence and extent of a license that would permit a- 'knock and talk' depends on the circumstances; homeowners who. post ‘No Trespassing’ or ‘No Soliciting’ signs effectively negate a license to enter the posted property.”); Commonwealth v. Ousley, 393 S.W.3d 15 , 29 (Ky.2013) (”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. United States v. Carloss · Bainter v. State

2. “The deputies ... deviated from established norms by entering upon that portion of the property directly in front of the window. Nothing in their testimony or the record establishes any license to do that. The officers had to step off the front door step, move two feet to the left, and position themselves directly in front of the window, their faces no more than a foot away. At that point they were virtually within the home without breaking its close. Because they physically entered a part of the curtilage where they had no right to be for the purpose of gaining information, the intrusion test is met.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 357 Wis. 2d 696 - State v. Popp

3. “Justice Harlan's concurring opinion [in Katz] stated the test in its most familiar form: first that a person [has] exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy and, second, that the expectation be one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 357 Wis. 2d 696 - State v. Popp