120 So. 3d 933 - State v. Santos-Castro’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Manson v. Brathwaite · 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The five factors include: 1) the witness’s opportunity to view the criminal at the time of the crime; 2) the witness’s degree of attention; 3) the accuracy of his prior description of the criminal; 4) the level of certainty demonstrated at the confrontation; and 5) the time between the crime and the confrontation. Manson, 432 U.S. at 114-15 , 97 S.Ct. at 2254 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“All persons concerned in the commission of a crime, whether present or absent, and whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, aid and abet in its commission, or directly or indirectly counsel or procure another to commit the crime, are principals.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.