Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 SW3D 707 - Peterson v. Shake

Peterson v. Shake’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gateway Construction Company v. Wallbaum · Ohio River Contract Co. v. Gordon · Ohio River Contract Co. v. Gordon · St. Clair v. Roark · Hyatt v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “procedural prerequisites for a writ are satisfied, `whether to grant or deny a petition for a writ is within the [Court of Appeals'] discretion,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “may have intended but failed to articulate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.