Schroff v. Smart’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bydalek v. Brines · Jackson County Board of Election Commissioners v. Paluka · Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Sharon Esters-Thames · Calarosa v. Stowell · Geiersbach v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Kansas City
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any party to a suit aggrieved by any judgment of any trial court in any civil cause from which an appeal is not prohibited by the constitution, nor clearly limited in special statutory proceedings, may take his or her appeal to a court having appellate jurisdiction from any [[Image here]] (5) Final judgment in the case[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“be 'aggrieved’ by the judgment below to have any right to appeal,” Schroff v. Smart, 120 S.W.3d 751, 754 (Mo. App. W.D. 2003).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.