Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 U.S. 46 - United States v. Symonds

United States v. Symonds’s Empirical Analysis

120 U.S. 46 · 1887

Citation profile

86
cited by 86 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 1986
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 86 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1986 · most notably Colten v. Commonwealth of Kentucky (1972), United States v. Eaton (1892)

22 federal appellate · 9 district · 2 state decisions

16018871890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Whitney · Ex parte Reed · Charles Gratiot v. The United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 86 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “But Congress certainly did not intend to confer authority upon the Secretary of the Navy to diminish an officer’s compensation, as established by law, by declaring that to be shore service which was, in fact, sea service, or to increase his compensation by declaring that to be sea service which was, in fact, shore service. The authority of the Secretary to enter orders, regulations, and instructions, with the approval of the President, in reference to matters connected with the naval establishment, is subject to the condition, necessarily implied, that they must be consistent with the statutes which have been enacted by Congress in reference to the navy. He may, with the approval of the President, establish regulations in execution of, or supplementary to, but not in conflict with, the statutes defining his powers or conferring rights upon others. The contrary has never been held by this court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.