¶1(concurring) — I concur in the result solely upon the ground which I wish to make clear and positive, and which is all-sufficient, that the legislation in question is not of the character of that involved in Spokane Hotel Co. v. Younger, 113 Wash. 359, 194 Pac. 595, but is merely regulation of dealing with property belonging wholly to the people of the state. The details of such regulations are merely committed to administrative officers. Otherwise such delegation 0f powers could never he logically and constitutionally sustained.
120 Wash. 126
Vail v. Seaborg
Decided May 11, 1922
Washington Supreme Court · decided 1922-05-11
Relies on Spokane Hotel Co. v. Younger
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1922-05-11
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently September 1998 · most notably 114 Wash. 2d 271 - Marincovich v. Tarabochia (1990), State Ex Rel. Bacich v. Huse (1936)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →