Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 120 Wash. 2d 327 - State v. Houf

120 Wash. 2d 327 - State v. Houf’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2019

14 state decisions

110199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Grayson · 117 Wash. 2d 701 - State v. Barnes · 117 Wash. 2d 211 - State v. Grewe · 108 Wash. 2d 458 - State v. McAlpin · 111 Wash. 2d 591 - State v. Irizarry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining any sentence, the trial court may rely on no more information than is admitted by the plea agreement, or admitted, acknowledged, or proved in a trial or at the time of sentencing.... Facts that establish the elements of a more serious crime or additional crimes may not be used to go outside the presumptive sentence range except upon stipulation or when specifically provided for in [the statute].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “consider only the actual crime of which the defendant has been convicted, his or her criminal history, and the circumstances surrounding the crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “indicate that any aggravating factors considered in imposing an exceptional sentence should be related to the crime with which the defendant is charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.