120 Wis. 2d 79 - State v. Schantek’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 63 Wis. 2d 412 - Levesque v. State · 132 Ill. App. 2d 558 - People v. Hart · 84 Wis. 2d 621 - Champlin v. State · Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. City of Milwaukee · 47 Wis. 2d 88 - CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & P. RR. CO. v. Milwaukee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the arrangement between Schantek and his employer clearly rendered certain presence inappropriate and thus beyond the limits of the employer's consent and Schantek's knowledge.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.