State v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
134 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 134 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably State v. Hedger (1989), State v. Tison (1981)
134 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dessureault · United States v. Barrett · State v. Singleton · State v. Burrell · United States v. Persico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 134 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is the trial court and not this Court which is in a position to determine first hand whether a juror can render a fair and impartial verdict. A clear showing of an abuse of discretion is, therefore, needed to overrule the trial judge’s determination. State v. Duke, 110 Ariz. 320 , 518 P.2d 570 (1974); State v. Narten, 99 Ariz. 116 , 407 P.2d 81 (1965); State v. Sorrell, 95 Ariz. 220 , 388 P.2d 429 (1964). The defendant must show the jury has been biased or that the selection process was somehow discriminatory. State v. Stolze, 112 Ariz. 124 , 539 P.2d 881 (1975).” 121 Ariz. at 139, 589 P.2d at 13.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(i) receiving evidence not properly admitted during the trial; (ii) deciding the verdict by lot; (iii) perjury or failure to respond fully during voir dire; (iv) receiving a bribe or pledging a vote; (v) intoxication during deliberation; (vi) conversing prior to verdict with any interested party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Paxton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.