Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 Ariz. 370 - Campbell v. Arnold

Campbell v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Ghadimi v. Soraya (2012), State v. Poli (1989)

1 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

160197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adams v. Bolin · Graham v. Moore · Campbell v. Hunt · State Board of Technical Registration v. Bauer · Riesland v. Bailey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““F. The panel shall determine, with respect to each claim against each defendant, whether the evidence presented to the panel by all parties supports a judgment for the plaintiff or for the defendant. “G. Within twenty days following completion of any hearing, the panel shall file a decision with the presiding judge and with the clerk of the superior court who shall mail copies to all parties. The panel shall state its decision, with respect to each claim against each defendant, in substantially the following language: 1. ‘After considering all evidence presented to the panel, we find for the plaintiff’; or 2. ‘After considering all evidence presented to the panel, we find for the defendant’.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.