In Re Herrscher’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 2002 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1003 (§ 4 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (§ 514 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on McCune v. City of Phoenix · Fogler v. Flindall (In Re Flindall) · Penick v. Hirsch (In Re Hirsch) · State v. Book-Cellar, Inc. · Siegel v. Swaine (In Re Siegel)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any and all State laws insofar as they ... relate to any employee benefit plan”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reed v. Drummond
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.