In Re Rutledge

In the Matter of Joann Griffin RUTLEDGE, Debtor. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT, Appellant, v. Joann Griffin RUTLEDGE, Appellee.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court

Decided November 7, 1990.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court · decided 1990-11-07

Relies on Rutledge v. Toyota Motor Credit (In Re Rutledge)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-11-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2017

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1John H. England, Tuscaloosa, Ala., for debtor/plaintiff.

¶2C. Stephen Alexander, Birmingham, Ala., for defendant.

¶3

MEMORANDUM OPINION

¶4ALLGOOD, Senior District Judge.

¶5This is an appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Alabama, Western Division. The issue on appeal is whether the collateral in question is part of the debtor's estate.

¶6The findings of fact and conclusions of law are clearly stated by the very able Bankruptcy Judge in his Memorandum of Decision. After reviewing the record and considering the arguments of the parties, this court AFFIRMS the decision of the Bankruptcy Judge and adopts his opinion in its entirety, as published at 115 B.R. 344.

¶7An order in conformity with this memorandum opinion will be entered.