Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 CAL 494 - People v. Long

People v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 1912
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the statute does not provide for a judgment-roll or a record of any kind, except through a bill of exceptions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.