Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 Conn. 115 - Wright v. Wright

Wright v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 1951
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1951

7 state decisions

30193619401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roth v. Ravich · Cone v. Dunham · Holway v. Ames · Tillinghast v. Iverson · Estabrook v. Moulton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Such court may, ... if any creditor, through no default of his own, shall have failed to present his claim within the time limited, for cause shown upon hearing after public notice, extend the time for such creditor to present his claim”, etc.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.