Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 F.1d 699 - Insley v. Garside

Insley v. Garside’s Empirical Analysis

121 F. 699 · 1903

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
July 1939
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1939

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

401903191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever a creditor, whose claim against a bankrupt estate is secured by the individual undertaking of any person, fails to prove such claim, such person may do so in the creditor's name, and if he discharge such undertaking in whole or in part he shall be subrogated to that extent to the rights of the creditor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.