Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 F.2d 263 - Samples v. United States

Samples v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

121 F.2d 263 · 1941

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
3
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably United States v. Cintolo (1987), United States v. Partin (1977)

49 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

22019411950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Russell · Pink Franklin v. State of South Carolina · Outlaw v. United States · Walker v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The statute is broad enough to cover any act, .committed corruptly, in an endeavor to impede or obstruct the due administration of justice.””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““or corruptly or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “miscarriage[s] of justice by corrupt methods.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.