Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 F.2d 420 - Halverson v. United States

Halverson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

121 F.2d 420 · 1941

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
December 1997
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 1997

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

140194119501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Raives v. Raives · United States v. Depew · Perkins v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America · United States v. Riggins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * although it was known to the Compensation Division of the Administration at all times after December, 1932, that Halverson was not in fact in good health at the time of the reinstatement of his policy, and had consulted physicians to ascertain the cause of the condition of which he complained, that fact may not be used to estop the Insurance Division from cancelling the policy. [Case cited.]” [Emphasis supplied.] 3”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““This was no routine examination such as many persons submit to periodically. That the result of that examination was reassuring to him did not justify his unequivocal denial of any consultation. Cf. Perkins v. Prudential Ins. Co., 7 Cir., 69 F.2d 218 . His clear recollection of all the consultations later when he desired to use them to support his claim for compensation negatives the idea of mere forgetfulness.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.