Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

121 F.2d 446

Docket No. 8659.

Lesh v. Prudential Ins.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1941.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1941-06-06

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1941-06-06

¶1James Harrington Boyd and Hall & Devlin, all of Toledo, Ohio, for appellant

¶2Doyle & Lewis and Wm. C. Moore, both of Toledo, Ohio, for appellee.

¶3Before HICKS, ALLEN, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing to the court that there was no prejudicial error, (1) in overruling appellant’s motion to remand the cause to the State court; (2) in the exclusion of testimony; (3) in the charge to the jury; (4) in the refusal to give special instructions; or (5) otherwise upon the record, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is in all things, affirmed.

/121/f2d/446 · .json · Public domain