Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 121 F.2d 692 - Smith v. United States

Smith v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

121 F.2d 692 · 1941

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 1975
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1975 · most notably United States v. Davis (1970), Ferro v. Commissioner (1957)

47 federal appellate · 1 district ·

4401941195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flanagan v. Helvering · Hyman v. Helvering · Brown v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Patty v. Helvering · Commissioner v. Cordingley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * were redeemed by the company at such time and in such manner as to make the distribution of the $206,936.34 essentially equivalent to the distribution of a taxable dividend.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The question whether a distribution in connection with a cancellation or redemption of stock is essentially equivalent to the distribution of a taxable dividend depends upon the circumstances of each case.” Section 39.-H5(g)-1.(2)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “* * * the net effect of the distribution rather than the motives and plans of the taxpayer or his corporation, is the fundamental question in administering § 115(g).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.